> You can now add |acoustic=1 in "[[{{{1}}}]]" . Feel free to start using it now. Later I'll try to get a bot to help. For starters, I did this to a random show at The Smashing Pumpkins 2018-07-22. After that, the "Notes" section was empty, so I removed it.
Cool. I'll update manually whenever I have an edit on an individual page. One thought is that it might potentially clutter a page for things like 2016 In Plainsong, where Malibu and Spaniards were the only electric songs (not counting solo keyboard Disarm). Would also potentially have to manually remove "acoustic" on piano songs on Billy's solo tours.
> SPLRA had it programmed that way (level 3 instead of level 2), and I took it as notes about the setlist, itself. Any notes about the show such as "Jimmy arrived late" or "Show almost ended due to people throwing shoes" should go in the intro as prose. These are the interesting bits and are what gets shown in page previews, on social media, or in Google search results, etc. I'm fine with "Notes" being 2 or 3 level, so long as anything interesting that's not directly related to the setlist is also in the intro as well :) Any especially interesting setlist-related things can go in the intro as well, of course.
Got it, thanks.
> Once we have all the acoustic=1 parameters plugged in, doing the research is as simple as running a query! I've been wanting to explore with making charts, too. Perhaps a pie chart on each tour page showing number of acoustic/non-acoustic/tease/abandoned/etc.?
Works for me!
> This is a good point. Right now we just have personnel in [infobox] and we include people even if they just played triangle in one song. That I like; it makes it easy to see which shows artists shared the same stage.
But I agree some granularity on a per-song level would be nice. So how about if we have something like:
1979 (Jimmy Flemion on drums, Jimmy Chamberlin on guitar)
It could be entered in with something like |with=Jimmy Frog=Drums,Jimmy Chamberlin=Guitar. How does that sound?
That generally works for me. If possible, I'd add "with" or something similar before the guest's name for clarity. Also, it might make more sense in most cases to simply note alternate instruments, such as "Jimmy plays guitar," on the tour pages. It remains maybe 95% constant on each tour and could potentially clutter a page up. Just using Shiny tour as an example, just OTOH:
1) Jimmy plays ukulele on Baby Mine
2) Billy plays some sort of keyboard on 3 songs, doesn't play an instrument on maybe 5-6 more, and is off stage completely for Blew Away
3) Katie plays acoustic guitar on Blew Away
4) I'd have to look it up, but Jack and Jimmy play keyboard on (I believe) 33 (and are off stage for Landslide). Pretty sure Jeff plays keyboard on one song too but I may be confusing with late 2018/2019 Disarm.
The list of one offs that I can think of are random 2011 To Sheila, 2000 Storytellers 1979 actually has Jimmy playing drums IIRC, and a few songs here and there in early 2000 with Billy playing keyboards.
Generally fine with however you feel about it, but that sort of general alt instrument rundown by tour is on my to do list as well. Possibly on individual song pages as well, such as when songs like Disarm and 1979 are played with or without backing tracks on different tours.
> Yes! Would |pa=1 make sense, so that it shows "(over PA)" like we're manually entering now? But anyway, having it stored this way in the database means we can exclude it from other counts. Indeed, it shouldn't say at Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness (song)#Tour stats that the song was played 208 times in full, heh!
I think so, although everything including the live music comes through the PA, technically. Maybe I'm being nitpicky (and I won't be offended if you tell me I am, lol), but may be another way to say it.
Thank you for all of your hard work!